Reported by 1 source

The short version

  • Biomechanical analysis of thylacine skulls reveals they were built for speed rather than power, making them ill-suited for killing large livestock.
  • European settlers mistakenly equated the animal's wolf-like appearance with wolf-like behavior, leading to government-sponsored bounties and systematic slaughter.
  • The findings highlight how colonial ignorance of local ecology and Indigenous knowledge contributed to the rapid extinction of a unique Australian species.

A fresh examination of fossilized remains suggests that the widespread belief in Tasmanian tigers as dangerous predators of farm animals was largely a myth. Published in Nature Communications, the study analyzes the skull structure of thylacines to argue that these striped marsupials were physically incapable of routinely killing sheep or cattle. This conclusion challenges the historical justification used by European colonists to hunt the species into extinction over two centuries ago.

When settlers arrived in Tasmania in the early 19th century, they encountered an animal that visually resembled the wolves of their homeland. Despite being marsupials more closely related to kangaroos than canines, thylacines shared a superficial similarity with dogs and wolves. Colonists projected familiar behaviors onto this unfamiliar wildlife, assuming that because the animals looked like predators known to attack livestock, they must behave in the same manner. This assumption led to the implementation of government bounties that incentivized the mass killing of the population.

News Journal

The new research focuses on the biomechanics of the thylacine head. While the skulls were roughly the same size as those of grey wolves, the animals themselves weighed significantly less, averaging around 37 pounds compared to the heavier wolf. This discrepancy resulted in a disproportionately large head for their body mass. More critically, the snouts of thylacines were long, slender, and delicate, lacking the robust, sturdy structure found in canines designed for grappling with large, struggling prey.

Scientists propose that these physical traits indicate a hunting style more akin to crocodiles or predatory fish than wolves. The elongated jaws would have allowed the tips of the snout to move at high speeds during a bite. This adaptation suggests the animals relied on quick, snapping motions to catch fast-moving, smaller targets such as bandicoots. The structure was not built for the powerful chomping force required to subdue large livestock, but rather for delivering precise, penetrating bites to unsuspecting small game.

The study authors note that while the jaws were long and potentially weak in terms of crushing power, the overall size of the skull provided enough structural integrity to withstand the forces generated during these rapid snaps. This aligns with previous findings regarding thylacine dentition, which indicated their teeth were suited for crushing and penetrating rather than tearing or holding onto large animals. The biomechanical evidence points to a predator specialized for speed and precision against small prey, not strength against large mammals.

The extinction of the thylacine is now viewed by researchers as a consequence of colonial ignorance and a failure to respect Indigenous custodianship of the land. Vera Weisbecker, an evolutionary biologist at Flinders University and lead author of the study, described the event as a story driven by a lack of understanding regarding Australia’s unique wildlife. The settlers’ reliance on European frameworks to interpret local ecology led to catastrophic misjudgments about the role thylacines played in their environment.

While the research suggests adult livestock were likely safe from thylacine attacks, experts acknowledge that desperate animals may occasionally target unguarded young stock. However, even if such incidents occurred, they were not frequent or severe enough to justify the label of ferocious livestock killers. The scale of the bounty system and the resulting slaughter far exceeded any actual threat posed by the species, accelerating their decline from an estimated 5,000 individuals in Tasmania to a single captive specimen.

The last known thylacine died in captivity in Hobart in 1936, marking the presumed extinction of the species. Although over 1,000 potential sightings have been reported since then, leading some to speculate about survival into the late 20th century, no definitive evidence has emerged. The new findings serve as a stark reminder of how easily ecological misunderstandings can lead to irreversible loss, particularly when cultural biases override scientific observation and local knowledge.

This case illustrates the phenomenon of convergent evolution, where unrelated species develop similar physical traits due to similar environmental pressures. Thylacines and wolves diverged from common ancestors over 120 million years ago, yet both evolved striped or spotted coats and carnivorous diets. However, their internal mechanics and hunting strategies remained fundamentally different. Recognizing these differences is crucial for accurately reconstructing the history of human-wildlife interactions in colonized regions.

The implications of this research extend beyond historical correction. It underscores the importance of rigorous scientific analysis in understanding animal behavior and ecology before implementing conservation or control measures. By relying on superficial similarities rather than detailed biological study, past generations made decisions that erased a unique lineage from the planet. Current conservation efforts must learn from these errors to avoid repeating similar mistakes with other misunderstood species.

Sources behind this briefing

Go to the original reporting