Reported by 1 source

The short version

  • Researchers found that forebrain and hindbrain cells develop independently in embryos, suggesting an evolutionary merger of two distinct nervous systems.
  • This discovery explains previous failures to generate hindbrain neurons from stem cells and enables the first successful creation of these cells in a lab setting.
  • While the findings offer new tools for studying diseases like ALS, some experts question whether the cell populations are truly independent or derived from a common ancestor.

A recent study published in Nature Neuroscience proposes that the human brain is not a single unified organ but rather the result of two distinct nervous systems merging over millions of years. Researchers at Stanford University observed that the front section of the brain, known as the forebrain, and the rear section, or hindbrain, form independently during early embryonic development. This structural division suggests that ancestral species possessed separate neural networks that eventually became compressed together within the skull.

The functional implications of this dual origin are significant. The forebrain is responsible for complex cognitive tasks such as language processing and abstract reasoning. In contrast, the hindbrain, often referred to as the brainstem, manages critical automatic functions including heartbeat regulation, sleep cycles, and hunger signals. It also controls motor functions for the face, tongue, and throat. Understanding how these two systems interact could provide deeper insights into both higher-order thinking and basic survival mechanisms.

News Journal

The research team analyzed mouse embryos approximately one week after conception to trace the origins of brain cells. They identified two distinct populations of progenitor cells based on gene expression. One group expressed the Otx2 gene, which directs development toward the forebrain and midbrain. The other group expressed the Gbx2 gene, leading to the formation of the hindbrain. These cell types also package their DNA differently, reinforcing the idea that they remain independent entities throughout development.

This evolutionary pattern appears to be conserved across various species. Similar distinct progenitor cells were observed in chickens, zebrafish, and acorn worms. This widespread presence suggests that the separation of neural lineages is an ancient trait. By comparing these findings with jellyfish, which have nervous systems on opposite sides of their bodies, scientists estimate that the fusion of these systems occurred between 550 million and 700 million years ago.

The discovery has immediate practical applications for medical research. Scientists have long struggled to convert human pluripotent stem cells into hindbrain nerve cells in laboratory settings. Previous attempts likely failed because researchers tried to derive hindbrain neurons from forebrain or midbrain progenitors, which the new study indicates is not possible. By recognizing the distinct origins of these cells, the Stanford team became the first to successfully generate functional hindbrain motor neurons from stem cells.

This breakthrough opens new avenues for studying neurological conditions that affect the brainstem. Diseases such as spinal muscular atrophy in infants and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Lou Gehrig’s disease, in adults are linked to dysfunction in this region. The ability to grow hindbrain neurons in a petri dish allows researchers to observe their functions and test potential treatments more accurately than before. This could lead to better models for understanding how these diseases progress and how they might be halted.

Despite the significance of these findings, not all experts agree with the conclusion that the brain originated from two separate nervous systems. Alex Pollen, a neurobiologist at the University of California, San Francisco, noted that it is difficult to prove that the two cell populations do not share a single, short-lived progenitor ancestor. The distinction observed might be a temporary phase in development rather than evidence of independent evolutionary lineages.

Cecilia Moens, a developmental biologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, also expressed skepticism regarding the fixed destinies of these cells. She pointed out that cells can sometimes swap fates, even if only for brief periods. This plasticity challenges the notion that forebrain and hindbrain cells are permanently segregated from the earliest stages of development. These counterarguments highlight the complexity of neural development and the need for further investigation.

The study represents a pivotal step in neuroscience by providing a new framework for understanding brain architecture. Whether the two-system theory holds up to scrutiny, the ability to culture hindbrain neurons is a substantial achievement. It addresses a long-standing technical barrier in regenerative medicine and offers a tangible tool for exploring the mysteries of the brainstem. Future research will likely focus on validating these developmental pathways across different species and refining stem cell techniques.

As scientists continue to explore the evolutionary history of the nervous system, this research underscores the importance of looking beyond the brain as a monolithic structure. The interplay between ancient neural systems may hold the key to unlocking treatments for some of the most challenging neurological disorders. While debates about the exact nature of these progenitor cells persist, the practical benefits of this discovery are already beginning to emerge in laboratory settings.

Sources behind this briefing

Go to the original reporting

  • Smithsonian Magazine↗Scientists Say the Human Brain Might Be Made of Two Distinct Nervous Systems That Got Squished Together