Reported by 1 source

The short version

  • Jaden J Read was taken into federal custody following an investigation triggered by a Crime Stoppers tip regarding online posts.
  • The alleged threats appeared on news articles discussing Donald Trump's scheduled appearance in the Wichita area.
  • The rally proceeded with minor disruptions, including one arrest for traffic interference and several individuals removed from the venue.

Federal law enforcement officials have arrested a twenty-four-year-old man from Kansas who is accused of posting online threats against President Donald Trump. Jaden J Read, a resident of Clearwater, was taken into custody last Saturday after investigators linked him to several comments made on social media platforms. The allegations center on posts that appeared to advocate for violence against the president during his upcoming campaign stop in the Wichita region.

The investigation began after a tip was submitted to Crime Stoppers on October 15. This lead directed federal agents to a Facebook thread where Read allegedly responded to a news report from KAKE News about Trump’s planned visit. In one comment, Read reportedly asked who would carry out an attack and expressed frustration with his current lifestyle. Shortly thereafter, he posted another message claiming possession of specific ammunition types and stating an intent to kill the president.

News Journal

Authorities also identified additional comments attributed to Read on a separate news article from KWCH 12 News. In these posts, he allegedly offered to shoot the president himself and claimed to have mapped out rooftops near the speech location. The language used in these messages suggested a premeditated plan to carry out an attack, prompting a multi-agency response.

Read was detained in Clearwater and transferred to federal custody. He is currently being held pending a detention hearing. The United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Kansas filed a criminal complaint against him, charging him with making threats against the president. This legal action underscores the federal government's stance on protecting elected officials from violent rhetoric.

Ryan A Kriegshauser, the US attorney for the district, emphasized that while the First Amendment protects robust political disagreement, it does not extend to threats of violence. He warned the public to remain within the bounds of constitutionally protected speech. The statement highlighted the distinction between lawful dissent and criminal intimidation, a line that federal prosecutors are increasingly vigilant about enforcing.

The case involved coordination among several law enforcement entities. The Secret Service and the US Marshals Service led the federal effort, working alongside state and local partners. These included the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, the Kansas Highway Patrol, and the Wichita Police Department. This collaborative approach reflects the standard protocol for handling potential threats against high-profile political figures.

Despite the pre-event security concerns, Trump’s rally in Park City proceeded as scheduled on Monday. The event drew approximately 6,000 attendees to the Heartland Credit Union Arena, located about ten minutes from downtown Wichita. Local authorities reported that the gathering was largely orderly, with only minor incidents disrupting the proceedings.

According to the Sedgwick County Sheriff’s Office, one individual was arrested near the designated free-speech zone for failing to comply with a lawful order related to traffic regulation. Additionally, eleven other people were escorted out of the arena for causing disruptions. These actions were described as routine security measures rather than responses to the specific threat posed by Read.

The arrest of Read serves as a reminder of the heightened security protocols surrounding presidential campaign events. While the alleged threats did not materialize into violence at the rally, they triggered a significant investigative response. The case illustrates how digital communications are monitored for potential dangers and how quickly authorities can act when credible tips emerge.

As Read awaits his detention hearing, the legal process will determine whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed with trial. The outcome of this case may influence future discussions about online speech and its limits. For now, the focus remains on ensuring the safety of political figures while respecting constitutional rights.

Sources behind this briefing

Go to the original reporting