The short version
- Rui Pinto alleges that Gianni Infantino used his former role as Uefa general secretary to mitigate sanctions for Manchester City and Paris St-Germain regarding financial irregularities in 2014.
- The accusations resurface as Manchester City faces a deadline to appeal its recent Premier League convictions for breaching financial rules, which were partly triggered by earlier Football Leaks disclosures.
- Infantino’s leadership is under increasing strain from multiple fronts, including criticism over the shelved World Cup stake sales and accusations of mismanagement regarding the Fifa Forward Enterprise scheme.
The controversy surrounding Fifa president Gianni Infantino has intensified following renewed allegations from Rui Pinto, the Portuguese computer hacker responsible for the Football Leaks data breach. Pinto, who released documents that initially spurred investigations into Manchester City’s financial practices, stated on social media that Infantino should have no role in the future of football. These comments come at a critical juncture for the English club, which has until October 2 to submit an appeal against its recent conviction for breaching Premier League financial regulations over a nine-year period.
Pinto’s latest statements echo claims first made in 2018, suggesting that Infantino intervened while serving as Uefa general secretary to protect Manchester City and Paris St-Germain from severe penalties. According to reports citing Der Spiegel, both clubs had overstated sponsorship deals to comply with Financial Fair Play rules. When facing potential sanctions, including bans from the Champions League, Pinto alleges that Infantino manipulated the process to ensure the clubs received only fines rather than deeper investigations or exclusions from European competition.
The hacker characterized Infantino’s actions as an abuse of authority, claiming he shared confidential documents and outmaneuvered the investigatory chamber. Pinto described the former Uefa official as a "cancer on football," arguing that his conduct undermined the integrity of financial regulations designed to ensure competitive balance. These allegations were part of the broader data dump that led to the current Premier League inquiry, which found Manchester City guilty of 115 breaches, though the club maintains it has acted in accordance with all rules.
Paris St-Germain has consistently denied any wrongdoing regarding the 2014 incidents. In a statement from that period, the French club asserted it had always complied with sports institution laws and highlighted that it was one of the most audited entities in history since the introduction of Financial Fair Play. The club rejected the notion that it sought special treatment or engaged in irregularities to meet financial thresholds.
Uefa has previously defended Infantino’s actions during his tenure as general secretary, stating that facilitating discussions and exchanging documents were within his remit. The European governing body noted that such interactions could include assisting investigating bodies in finding solutions. Infantino himself has argued that his role naturally involves extensive communication and document exchange on numerous topics, insisting he performed his duties honestly and professionally to defend football’s interests.
Beyond these historical allegations, Infantino faces fresh criticism regarding his current leadership of Fifa. Pressure mounted after plans to sell stakes in the World Cup were shelved, leading to accusations of poor governance. Uefa has accused Infantino of criminal mismanagement concerning the Fifa Forward Enterprise scheme, a development that has eroded confidence among some member associations.
The Swiss Football Association recently withdrew its support for Infantino, citing fundamental questions about leadership, transparency, and decision-making processes within Fifa. This withdrawal follows a comprehensive reassessment of recent events, reflecting growing unease among European football authorities. The SFV’s statement underscored concerns that various incidents have raised serious doubts about the integrity of Fifa’s operations under Infantino’s presidency.
Infantino is scheduled to stand for re-election in March 2027, marking his fourth term as president. Potential opponents have until November 18 to nominate alternative candidates. The convergence of renewed allegations from Football Leaks, ongoing legal challenges involving Manchester City, and institutional criticism from Uefa and national associations creates a complex political landscape for Infantino. His ability to retain power will likely depend on how he navigates these competing pressures and addresses concerns about transparency and governance.
The situation highlights the enduring impact of data leaks on football’s regulatory framework. While Manchester City continues to deny any wrongdoing, the Premier League investigation remains active pending their appeal. Meanwhile, Fifa must contend with internal dissent and external scrutiny as it prepares for the next presidential election. The interplay between historical financial disputes and current governance issues underscores the fragility of trust in global football administration.
As the deadline for Manchester City’s appeal approaches, attention will remain fixed on how the Premier League handles the case and whether new evidence emerges. Simultaneously, Fifa members will weigh their support for Infantino against the backdrop of these controversies. The outcome could reshape the leadership structure of international football and influence how financial regulations are enforced in the future.
Sources behind this briefing
Go to the original reporting
- BBC News↗Infantino should have no place in future of football - Pinto
