Reported by 1 source

The short version

  • The United States has suspended permanent labor certification applications for eight major technology firms, including Microsoft and several Indian IT giants, effectively halting a key pathway to green cards for skilled workers.
  • Industry leaders report that the financial impact on corporations is likely minimal due to prior reductions in visa dependence and increased local hiring, though data confirms a sharp decline in recent filings.
  • Immigration experts warn of significant personal disruption for employees stuck in prolonged residency limbo, compounded by rising online hostility and restrictive rhetoric from high-ranking officials.

The United States government has announced a suspension of permanent labor certification applications for eight prominent technology companies, a move that disrupts a traditional route to permanent residency for many skilled international workers. The affected firms include Microsoft, as well as major Indian information technology services providers such as Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services, Wipro, and HCL Technologies. This administrative freeze targets the Permanent Labor Certification Program, commonly known as PERM, which serves as a critical bridge for employees holding temporary H-1B visas who seek to transition to green cards and eventually citizenship.

For millions of Indian professionals, this pathway represented a predictable career trajectory: obtaining an engineering degree, securing employment with a tech services firm, receiving a posting in the United States, and relying on repeated visa renewals while awaiting permanent residency approval. The current policy shift introduces significant uncertainty into this established model. While the immediate effect is a halt to new and pending applications under the PERM program for these specific entities, the broader implications extend beyond administrative delays to affect the long-term stability of thousands of workers who have invested years in building careers within the American tech sector.

News Journal

Corporate representatives suggest that the operational impact on business revenue may be limited, citing strategic shifts toward local hiring and reduced reliance on foreign labor certifications. Nasscom, a trade association representing India’s technology industry, noted that member companies have actively decreased their dependence on H-1B visas in recent years. Wipro stated that more than eighty percent of its US workforce is hired locally, while Tata Consultancy Services reported that its PERM applications dropped to single digits over the last two years. Microsoft indicated that its recent visa filings were primarily intended to retain existing staff rather than import new talent.

Data supports the claim of declining usage among some firms. Reports indicate that Tata Consultancy Services filed only two applications in the 2025-26 period, a stark contrast to 513 filings the previous year and 1,804 before that. No records were found for Infosys and Wipro during the same recent timeframe. Brokerage firm HDFC Securities argued that because PERM-linked positions constitute a small fraction of overall revenue, the substitution with higher-paid American workers would not severely disrupt financial performance. However, attempts to gather detailed responses from all eight companies regarding employee support measures yielded no answers, leaving some questions about internal mitigation strategies unanswered.

Despite the muted corporate response, the human consequences appear more acute. A senior executive at one of the affected firms described the situation as intense on a personal level, noting that many employees are trapped in a state of limbo after spending years in the United States without progress on their residency applications. Even for those willing to return to India, family dynamics complicate the decision; children who grew up in the US often resist relocation. This stagnation affects individuals who borrowed heavily to pursue education and careers with the expectation of eventual permanent status, now facing fewer options and diminished capacity to absorb the costs of prolonged uncertainty.

The policy environment has also grown more hostile toward foreign professionals. Vice President JD Vance recently referred to H-1B visa holders as foreign indentured servants, a characterization that drew sharp criticism from India’s foreign ministry for its colonial connotations. Although Vance later described his remarks as imperfect rhetoric, the language contributed to an atmosphere of increased scrutiny and animosity. Researchers at Stop AAPI Hate reported a sharp rise in anti-South Asian online sentiment following the 2024 US election, with Indian immigrants and visa holders frequently targeted. This social climate adds psychological pressure to the logistical challenges posed by the new restrictions.

Immigration experts caution that alternative routes to residency are limited and often impractical for the average worker. While transferring to a company not covered by the suspension might seem like a viable option, fear of retaliation or broader market reluctance to hire immigrants could deter such moves. Furthermore, the technology sector is currently navigating layoffs, cost-cutting measures, and rapid artificial intelligence adoption, making career transitions difficult. Some individuals may reconsider their future in the United States altogether, while others may choose not to migrate at all, potentially altering the demographic composition of the tech workforce over time.

The suspension aligns with a broader push for stricter skilled-worker immigration rules under the current administration. While alternative categories exist for those with exceptional accomplishments or work advancing national interests, these pathways are narrow and do not accommodate the majority of standard tech employees. As the backlog of Indian applicants for employment-based green cards remains substantial, the freeze on PERM applications for major firms represents a significant tightening of access. The long-term effects on both the US technology industry’s labor supply and the personal trajectories of affected workers will likely unfold gradually, shaped by further policy developments and market adaptations.

Sources behind this briefing

Go to the original reporting