The short version
- Ukraine has appealed to the FIA Court of Appeal regarding the reinstatement of Russian competitors in international events.
- The protest centers on allegations that the Russian Automobile Federation operates offices in Ukrainian territories occupied by Russia.
- The decision follows similar moves by the International Olympic Committee and other global sports federations.
The governing body for international motorsport has faced intensified legal pressure from Ukraine after reversing a ban on competitors from Russia and Belarus. The Ukrainian Automobile Federation, known as the FAU, has formally appealed to the FIA Court of Appeal, the organization’s highest judicial authority. This escalation comes just three days after the federation requested an urgent investigation by the FIA ethics committee into the reversal. The move marks a significant deepening of the diplomatic and sporting rift between Kyiv and Paris-based motorsport leadership.
The original prohibition on Russian and Belarusian participation in international events was instituted in February 2022, immediately following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. For over four years, athletes from these nations were excluded from global competitions under FIA regulations. However, the restriction was lifted on August 3, aligning with a broader shift in international sports policy. This change followed a decision by the International Olympic Committee to remove its own similar bans, prompting other federations to update their eligibility requirements accordingly.
The core of Ukraine’s complaint lies in the operational conduct of the Russian Automobile Federation, or RAF. The FAU asserts that the RAF has established and is actively running offices in regions of Ukraine currently occupied by Russian forces. These areas include Crimea, the city of Sevastopol, and parts of the Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts. Under United Nations resolutions, these territories remain recognized as sovereign Ukrainian land. The FAU argues that maintaining administrative presence in these zones constitutes a direct violation of international sporting codes.
Oleksandr Feldman, president of the FAU, characterized the situation as a flagrant breach of FIA statutes. He emphasized that national sporting authorities cannot be established or legitimized through military aggression. Feldman stated that the RAF is bound by the same rules as every other member organization and must comply with the International Sporting Code. The code permits only one automobile club per country, a principle the FAU claims has been undermined by the RAF’s actions in occupied zones.
The Ukrainian federation further contends that lifting the ban effectively imposes new restrictions on Ukrainian competitors. Many partner nations have prohibited participation in events where national symbols of Russia are displayed. By allowing Russian athletes to compete under their national flags or emblems, the FIA may be forcing Ukrainian drivers and officials into a position where they cannot participate without violating their own country’s laws or ethical standards. This creates a de facto disadvantage for Ukrainian participants in international circuits.
The human cost of the conflict remains a central point in the FAU’s argument. The federation noted that twenty-three Ukrainian motorsport competitors and officials have been killed since the invasion began. The war has severely disrupted domestic motorsport activities and restricted freedom of movement across the country. In contrast, Boris Rotenberg, the head of the RAF, is subject to international sanctions imposed by the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and other allied jurisdictions due to his ties to the Russian government.
The decision to lift the ban was approved by the FIA World Motor Sport Council. Reports indicate that the proposal was put forward by FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem. Recent changes to the FIA statutes have placed the ethics committee under the control of Ben Sulayem and his ally, Senate president Carmelo Sanz de Barros. This structural shift has raised questions about the independence of ethical oversight within the organization, particularly as it handles complaints related to geopolitical conflicts.
The FIA maintains that it continues to prohibit the hosting of international events in Russia and Belarus. A statement issued by the organization emphasized that it is closely monitoring the situation in Ukraine and reserves the right to update its position in the future. However, the FAU has vowed to pursue all available legal remedies to restore what it describes as the integrity of the motorsport system. The outcome of this appeal could set a precedent for how international sports bodies handle geopolitical disputes involving occupied territories.
As the legal battle unfolds, the broader implications for global motorsport governance remain uncertain. The conflict highlights the tension between sporting neutrality and political accountability in an era of ongoing warfare. While some federations have moved toward normalization, others continue to enforce strict penalties. The FIA’s response to this high-profile appeal will likely influence how other international organizations navigate similar challenges in the coming years.
For now, the focus remains on the procedural next steps within the FIA judicial system. The Court of Appeal must determine whether the RAF’s operations in occupied Ukraine violate the statutes and codes that govern member nations. Until a ruling is issued, the status of Russian competitors remains technically reinstated, but their participation may face continued scrutiny and potential disruption from national federations aligned with Ukraine.
Sources behind this briefing
Go to the original reporting
- BBC Sport↗Ukraine escalates protest over FIA lifting Russia ban
