The short version
- Five former Barclays employees had their convictions for rigging Libor and Euribor rates overturned by the Court of Appeal, adding to a growing list of cleared bankers.
- The ruling follows similar successes by Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, suggesting that earlier prosecutions may have targeted standard commercial practices rather than criminal fraud.
- Only two traders currently retain convictions for rate manipulation, though both are preparing legal challenges to overturn their guilty pleas or sentences.
A significant chapter in the aftermath of the global financial crisis closed on Wednesday as the Court of Appeal overturned the convictions of five former Barclays traders. These individuals had been sentenced for manipulating Libor and Euribor, the benchmark interest rates that underpinned trillions of dollars in loans, mortgages, and financial derivatives worldwide. The ruling marks a decisive legal shift, reinforcing arguments made by previous defendants that they were prosecuted for ordinary market behaviors rather than criminal conspiracy.
The five men—Jay Merchant, Jonathan Mathew, Philippe Moryoussef, Alex Pabon, and Colin Bermingham—were originally convicted of conspiracy to defraud. Their trials took place during a period of intense public anger toward the banking sector following the 2008 economic collapse. Prosecutors had presented them as symbols of institutional greed, arguing that their actions distorted critical financial benchmarks to mask losses or boost trading profits. However, the appellate court’s decision suggests that the evidence did not meet the threshold for criminal fraud.
This development follows a series of high-profile legal victories for other traders involved in similar cases. Tom Hayes, a former UBS trader who was the first banker jailed in the Libor scandal, successfully had his conviction overturned by the Supreme Court in July 2025 after a decade-long battle. His case, along with that of Carlo Palombo, established a precedent that challenged the narrative used by prosecutors. Both men argued that their actions constituted normal commercial practices within the interbank lending market, not criminal deceit.
The impact of these rulings is profound for those who served prison time. Merchant, Mathew, Pabon, and Bermingham have all completed portions of their sentences. Moryoussef was sentenced in absentia in 2018 after France refused extradition requests, meaning he never served time in the UK. For those who were incarcerated, the quashing of convictions offers a formal correction to the public record. Mathew described the relief as validation that an injustice had occurred, noting the personal toll the legal battle took on his family life over the past ten years.
Merchant echoed these sentiments, stating that while he looks forward to moving on, he remains committed to holding those responsible for the broader systemic failures accountable. The distinction between individual trader misconduct and institutional negligence has been a central theme in the post-crisis era. The original prosecutions were driven by a desire to demonstrate accountability after taxpayers bailed out major financial institutions. Yet, as more convictions are overturned, questions arise about whether the legal system targeted individuals to appease public outrage rather than addressing deeper structural issues.
The Serious Fraud Office, which brought the original charges against the Barclays traders, did not oppose the latest appeals. This lack of resistance signals a potential recalibration in how regulatory agencies approach complex financial crimes. The Libor scandal erupted in 2012 when it was revealed that banks had been misrepresenting their borrowing costs during the crisis. While some manipulation undoubtedly occurred, the line between aggressive trading and criminal fraud has proven difficult to define in court.
With these five convictions cleared, only two traders remain with standing convictions for interest rate rigging: Christian Bittar of Deutsche Bank and Peter Johnson of Barclays. Bittar pleaded guilty in 2018 and served two years in prison but is scheduled to challenge his conviction on October 9. Johnson, who initially blew the whistle on the scandal before pleading guilty on legal advice, also intends to appeal. Their cases represent the final frontier in this long-running legal saga.
The broader implications extend beyond individual careers. The Libor and Euribor benchmarks have since been replaced by more robust alternatives, reducing the potential for similar manipulation. However, the legacy of these prosecutions continues to shape perceptions of financial justice. As more traders see their convictions overturned, it becomes increasingly clear that the legal response to the 2008 crisis may have been overly punitive toward individuals while leaving larger institutional responsibilities unaddressed.
Full reasons for the Court of Appeal’s decision are expected to be published later this week. Until then, the focus remains on what this ruling means for future financial crime prosecutions. If the trend continues, it could lead to a reevaluation of how regulators define misconduct in complex markets. For now, the cleared traders await formal documentation of their vindication, while the remaining defendants prepare their own legal challenges.
Barclays has been contacted for comment regarding the latest developments. The bank played a central role in the original scandal, with several of its employees facing criminal charges. How the institution responds to these overturned convictions may influence public perception of corporate accountability. As the dust settles on this decade-long legal battle, the financial industry watches closely to see whether similar cases will follow suit.
Sources behind this briefing
Go to the original reporting
- BBC News↗Ex-bankers jailed for rigging rates have convictions quashed
