The short version
- OpenAI and Nvidia are partnering with SoftBank subsidiary SB Energy to build a massive AI data center in Piketon, Ohio, scheduled for completion in 2028.
- The project aims to create tens of thousands of construction jobs and permanent positions in a region with high poverty rates, though local officials express mixed feelings about the influx.
- Environmental groups warn of significant air pollution from a new natural gas plant and potential health risks linked to the site's history as a uranium enrichment facility.
A sprawling artificial intelligence infrastructure project is taking shape in the Appalachian foothills of southern Ohio, drawing both economic optimism and environmental scrutiny. OpenAI, Nvidia, and Japanese investors are committing approximately $500 billion to construct one of the largest data centers globally near Piketon. The facility, which will occupy roughly 640 acres, is designed to deliver 8 gigawatts of computing power. Groundbreaking ceremonies in March featured high-level government officials, signaling strong federal support for the initiative as part of broader efforts to expand domestic AI capabilities.
The operational structure involves SB Energy, a subsidiary of Japan’s SoftBank Group, which will own and manage the site. OpenAI has secured a twenty-year lease to utilize the computing capacity provided by Nvidia infrastructure. The project is slated to open in 2028, requiring substantial upfront investment and long-term commitment from international partners. This collaboration reflects a strategic alignment between American technology firms and Japanese capital, aiming to solidify the United States' position in the global AI race while leveraging foreign direct investment.
Economic projections for Pike County are ambitious, with estimates suggesting the creation of 35,000 construction jobs during the build phase and 2,500 permanent operating positions once the facility is active. These figures hold particular significance for a region where the poverty rate exceeds 19 percent, nearly double the national average. Local leaders acknowledge that the area lacks the existing workforce to absorb such a surge in employment demand independently. Consequently, the influx of tens of thousands of workers over the next six years poses logistical challenges for housing, services, and community infrastructure.
Despite the potential economic benefits, local sentiment remains divided. Billy Spencer, the mayor of Piketon, described his emotions as ranging from positive to skeptical. He noted a lack of organized opposition within the village limits, observing that few residents have directly engaged with council members regarding the project. This quiet reception contrasts with the intense public debates seen in other regions facing similar developments. The absence of vocal resistance may stem from historical economic stagnation following the closure of local industries, leaving many residents hopeful for any sign of revitalization.
Environmental concerns are mounting as details about the project’s energy requirements emerge. To meet the massive power demands of the data center, a new natural gas plant is planned nearby, funded largely by Japanese investment totaling $33 billion. Critics argue that this facility could become one of the largest natural gas plants in the country, releasing millions of pounds of pollutants including carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides. Carol Kauffman of the Ohio Environmental Council highlighted the astronomical contribution to climate change and public health risks associated with such emissions, noting additional upstream impacts from fracking and methane leakage.
The site selection itself adds another layer of complexity due to its history. Part of the data center footprint lies on a decommissioned uranium enrichment facility known locally as the A-Plant, which operated for nearly six decades until 2001. Communities in Pike County have long blamed the Department of Energy-run site for elevated cancer rates and other health issues. In 2019, radiation levels detected in a local middle school forced its closure, reinforcing deep-seated mistrust regarding industrial activities in the area. Residents remain wary of reintroducing heavy industry to land already marked by environmental contamination.
Water usage presents another point of contention. Local leaders indicate that construction alone may require up to two million gallons of water for waste management purposes. This demand raises questions about sustainability and strain on local resources, particularly in a region not accustomed to supporting hyperscale industrial operations. Previous attempts to introduce large-scale facilities, such as a proposed waste disposal plant, faced significant opposition from residents who were concerned about environmental degradation and quality of life impacts.
The political context surrounding the investment introduces further uncertainty. The project is partly driven by trade agreements between the United States and Japan, wherein Japanese investment was exchanged for reduced tariffs on Japanese goods. However, shifts in federal administration following the 2028 presidential election could alter these trade dynamics. If future policies reverse current tariff structures, the financial incentives for Japanese investors might diminish, potentially jeopardizing the project’s viability. Mayor Spencer acknowledged this vulnerability, noting that political changes could impact the stability of foreign capital commitments.
Broader national trends also influence local perceptions. Data centers have become flashpoints for community anger across America due to their intensive resource consumption. New York recently became the first state to pause permitting for hyperscale data centers, reflecting growing regulatory caution. While Ohio has not adopted similar measures, the precedent set by other states underscores the potential for increased scrutiny. As the Piketon project moves forward, it serves as a test case for balancing technological advancement with environmental stewardship and community well-being in rural America.
Looking ahead, the success of the Piketon data center will depend on navigating these multifaceted challenges. Stakeholders must address immediate concerns about air quality, water usage, and historical contamination while ensuring that promised economic benefits materialize for local residents. The interplay between international investment, federal trade policy, and local governance creates a complex landscape where any disruption could have far-reaching consequences. As construction begins, the region watches closely to see whether this massive undertaking will deliver prosperity or exacerbate existing vulnerabilities.
Sources behind this briefing
Go to the original reporting
- The Guardian US↗Hope and concern swirls for Ohioans around ‘world’s largest datacenter’
