Reported by 1 source

The short version

  • Adults produced more original and useful work than children in controlled tasks, contradicting the belief that creativity diminishes with age.
  • Participants in their twenties reported significantly higher anxiety and lower confidence than preschoolers, who approached tasks with intrinsic motivation.
  • Researchers attribute adult hesitation to a focus on outcomes and fear of rejection, whereas children view mistakes as part of play.

A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Graz, in collaboration with UCLouvain and Yale University, challenges the long-held assumption that human creativity inevitably declines as individuals age. The research indicates that adults actually demonstrate higher creative potential than young children when measured by objective standards, but they are often held back by psychological barriers such as anxiety and a lack of confidence.

The investigation involved 92 preschool-aged children between four and seven years old and 70 adults, most of whom were in their twenties. Participants were asked to complete three distinct creative exercises. The first task required generating as many novel uses for a tin can as possible within a three-minute window. The second allowed participants to draw anything they wished without a time constraint, while the third involved sketching an imaginary creature within eight minutes.

News Journal

Independent judges evaluated the outputs based on originality, usefulness, and overall creative merit. The results showed that adult submissions were rated higher across these metrics than those produced by the children. This performance gap was particularly pronounced in tasks that featured clear objectives and strict time limits, suggesting that adults can leverage their cognitive maturity to produce more sophisticated creative work when structured appropriately.

Despite their superior output, the adult participants reported feeling significantly less confident and more anxious about their performance compared to the younger group. The children, by contrast, expressed high levels of motivation and enjoyment throughout the exercises. They approached the activities with a sense of playfulness that allowed them to experiment freely without the burden of self-criticism.

Dr. Mathias Benedek, the senior author from the University of Graz, noted that society often mistakes children’s intense engagement in play for superior creative ability. He argued that adults are frequently paralyzed by the fear that their original ideas will be rejected or judged harshly. This apprehension leads many grownups to dismiss unconventional thoughts before they even attempt to develop them.

The study highlights a fundamental difference in motivation between the two age groups. Children are driven by intrinsic interest and the joy of the process itself, treating errors as natural components of exploration. Adults, however, tend to focus heavily on the end goal or objective. This outcome-oriented mindset can diminish enjoyment and restrict the willingness to take risks, which are essential components of creative thinking.

The researchers acknowledge several limitations in their findings. The study represents a snapshot comparison of only two specific age groups, which makes it difficult to draw broad conclusions about how creativity changes throughout the entire lifespan. Additionally, children may respond differently to rating scales due to cognitive development differences, and their tendency toward extreme answers could skew self-reported data on confidence and anxiety.

Nevertheless, the findings suggest that the common narrative of fading creativity in adulthood is a misconception. Rather than losing the capacity for innovation, adults appear to lose the assurance needed to exercise it. The study implies that fostering environments where failure is accepted and judgment is minimized could help adults unlock their inherent creative potential.

These insights have practical implications for education and workplace design. If anxiety and fear of rejection are primary inhibitors of adult creativity, then structures that encourage risk-taking and reduce performance pressure may be more effective than those that simply demand output. Understanding the psychological barriers to innovation could lead to better strategies for maintaining creative vitality across all stages of life.

The research was published in the journal Plos One and offers a nuanced view of human development. It suggests that while cognitive abilities evolve, the emotional landscape surrounding creativity also shifts in ways that can hinder performance. Addressing these emotional hurdles may be key to preserving the innovative spirit that is often associated with childhood.

Sources behind this briefing

Go to the original reporting

  • The Guardian US↗Do people become less creative as they get older? Research makes surprising discovery