Reported by 1 source

The short version

  • A Minnesota administrative law judge determined there is probable cause to believe Mike Lindell violated state campaign finance statutes by distributing free pillows at a public event.
  • The ruling allows the complaint, filed by a Democratic state senate candidate, to proceed to an evidentiary hearing before a three-judge panel.
  • Lindell denies any wrongdoing, asserting he received prior approval from state officials and characterizing the legal challenge as a politically motivated attack.

A Minnesota administrative law judge has issued a ruling that advances a complaint alleging Mike Lindell violated state campaign finance laws during his gubernatorial bid. Judge Nicholas Lienesch determined on Thursday that there is probable cause to believe the MyPillow founder distributed items of monetary value with the intent to influence voter behavior. The decision does not constitute a final determination of guilt but rather establishes that sufficient facts exist in the record to warrant a full evidentiary hearing before a three-judge administrative panel.

The complaint originated from Dan Fiskum, a Democrat running for the state senate. Fiskum alleged that Lindell threw free pillows from his company at a Fourth of July parade in Delano, Minnesota. Under state law, it is prohibited to give away or promise anything of monetary value to induce a voter to support a specific candidate or refrain from voting. While food and beverages valued under five dollars are exempt from this rule, the judge noted that pillows do not fall under any explicit statutory exemption.

News Journal

In his four-page ruling, Judge Lienesch wrote that there is probable cause to believe the pillows constituted things of monetary value. The judge further stated there is probable cause to believe these items were distributed specifically to induce voters to vote in a particular way at an upcoming election. This legal development comes just days before the state’s primary election, which will narrow the field of candidates competing for the Republican and Democratic nominations.

Lindell has strongly rejected the allegations, describing the complaint as complete nonsense. He argued that he had previously consulted with Minnesota’s campaign finance board regarding the pillow giveaway and received confirmation that his actions were permissible. Lindell characterized the timing of the legal challenge as a deliberate attempt to cast doubt on his candidacy right before the primary vote. He maintained that no laws were broken and labeled the proceedings as a disgusting attack on his campaign.

During a recent hearing, Lindell attempted to distinguish his pillow distribution from typical campaign violations by comparing it to other common political merchandise. He argued there was no meaningful difference between handing out pillows accompanied by campaign literature and distributing standard items like buttons or keychains. Lindell also drew parallels to his campaign’s practice of purchasing copies of his memoir, What Are the Odds? From Crack Addict to CEO, and giving them away for free at events.

When questioned about the value of the pillows to recipients, Lindell suggested that the worth is subjective. He noted that many of the pillows went to children who would enjoy hugging them and sleeping well. For adult recipients, he argued that they did not necessarily perceive a specific monetary value, such as ten dollars, in receiving the item for free. However, the judge’s ruling focused on the statutory definition of monetary value rather than the subjective perception of the recipients.

Lindell recently stepped down as CEO of MyPillow to dedicate his full attention to the governor’s race. He described this transition as one of the most significant decisions of his life, following an endorsement from former President Donald Trump three weeks prior. The MyPillow founder is facing a crowded primary field, including six Republican rivals such as House Speaker Lisa Demuth and state-endorsed candidate Kendall Qualls, as well as seven Democratic opponents led by Senator Amy Klobuchar.

The legal scrutiny adds to a period of financial and legal challenges for Lindell. His net worth, once estimated at $300 million, has declined in recent years. He has also faced multiple defamation lawsuits and financial judgments related to his persistent claims that the 2020 presidential election was rigged. The upcoming evidentiary hearing will determine whether the pillow distribution constitutes a violation of Minnesota’s strict campaign finance regulations.

The primary election next week will serve as a critical filter for the general election in November. The outcome of the administrative hearing may not be resolved before voters head to the polls, but the ruling itself has already introduced a layer of legal uncertainty into Lindell’s campaign. As the case moves forward, the focus will shift to whether the evidence presented supports the judge’s initial finding of probable cause.

This case highlights the ongoing tension between creative campaign outreach and strict regulatory compliance in modern elections. While candidates frequently distribute branded merchandise, the classification of certain items as monetary value remains a point of contention. The Minnesota Administrative Law Judge’s decision underscores the rigorous application of state statutes, regardless of the candidate’s prominence or political alliances.

Sources behind this briefing

Go to the original reporting