The short version
- The percentage of British Jews identifying as Zionist rose by seven points to 66% between 2022 and 2025, according to a study by the Institute for Jewish Policy Research.
- Emotional attachment to Israel increased significantly, with 51% reporting strong ties in June 2025, while concerns about antisemitism as a major problem tripled to 50%.
- Jewish voters supporting the Green Party showed divergent trends, with decreased attachment to Israel and lower identification as Zionist compared to the broader community.
A recent study conducted by the Institute for Jewish Policy Research reveals a notable shift in how British Jews perceive their identity and connection to Israel following the attacks on October 7. The research, titled 'October 8 Jews: The Impact of October 7 on British Jewish Identity,' highlights an increase in Zionist identification among this demographic. Between 2022 and 2025, the proportion of British Jews who identified as Zionist grew by seven percentage points, reaching 66%. This trend suggests a strengthening alignment with Zionist ideals within the community during this period.
The data also shows a heightened sense of emotional attachment to Israel. By June 2025, 51% of respondents reported feeling very emotionally connected to the country, marking a 13-point rise from pre-war levels. Additionally, support for Israel became more central to Jewish identity for many participants, with 45% stating that backing Israel was very important to their sense of self—an increase of 10 points. These figures underscore a deepening bond between British Jews and Israel amidst ongoing geopolitical tensions.
Concerns about antisemitism have surged concurrently with these shifts in identity. The study found that half of the surveyed individuals now view antisemitism as a very significant issue in the UK, tripling from earlier measurements. Jonathan Boyd, director of JPR, linked this growing concern directly to increased attachment to Israel, suggesting that fears for safety and security influence communal solidarity. He noted that many British Jews have close family or friends residing in Israel, making events there personally impactful.
However, not all segments of the Jewish community exhibit uniform trends. Notably, those affiliated with the Green Party demonstrate contrasting patterns. Among Jewish Greens, feelings of emotional attachment to Israel declined slightly, dropping one point to 7% between 2023 and 2024. Similarly, only 3% considered supporting Israel crucial to their Jewish identity, down eight points over the same timeframe. Identification as Zionist also decreased among this group, falling three points to 14%. These differences highlight varying priorities and values within diverse subsets of the population.
Age appears to be another factor influencing perspectives on Israel. Younger Jews aged 16 to 29 were less likely than older generations to regard support for Israel as integral to their identity. In 2024, just 27% of young adults felt strongly about this aspect, reflecting a one-point decline. Boyd attributed this generational divide to differing experiences; younger cohorts tend to associate Israel primarily with conflicts involving Gaza and Hamas rather than historical narratives emphasized by previous generations.
Migration intentions further illustrate varied attitudes across demographics. While overall willingness to relocate to Israel rose modestly—from 1.38 to 1.99 on a scale of zero to ten—Jewish Greens exhibited markedly lower interest, scoring only 0.2 compared to earlier scores of 0.7. Haredi Orthodox Jews and individuals aged 50 to 59 emerged as the most inclined toward emigration. Boyd suggested that demographic changes, particularly higher birthrates within Orthodox communities, might amplify pro-Israel sentiments over time due to cultural affinities.
Political affiliations also correlate with shifts in opinion. Conservative voters demonstrated the strongest movement toward pro-Israel and Zionist viewpoints, alongside heightened worries about antisemitism. Conversely, Jewish Greens remained skeptical of such alignments, often prioritizing broader societal issues over specific national loyalties. Boyd explained that secular frameworks typical among Green supporters make them more susceptible to external discourse shaping their views.
Looking ahead, the implications of these findings extend beyond immediate reactions to recent events. Boyd cautioned against rhetoric that fails to acknowledge why Israel holds such significance for many Jews, warning it could alienate communities further rightward. He urged policymakers to balance criticism of Israeli actions with empathy for Jewish concerns, emphasizing the need for constructive dialogue addressing both security fears and humanitarian considerations.
This analysis comes amid evolving political landscapes, including upcoming debates at party conferences regarding Zionism's classification. Although the study predates certain developments like new trade sanctions or regional escalations, its insights offer valuable context for understanding contemporary dynamics within British Jewish life. As discussions continue, monitoring these trends will remain essential for fostering inclusive policies respecting diverse viewpoints.
Ultimately, the research underscores complex interplays between personal identity, political belief systems, and external pressures affecting British Jews today. Recognizing nuances among different groups—whether defined by age, religion, or party preference—is critical for navigating future challenges effectively. Engaging openly about shared histories while acknowledging distinct realities can help bridge divides and promote mutual understanding moving forward.
Sources behind this briefing
Go to the original reporting
- The Guardian World↗British Jews more likely to identify as Zionist since 7 October attacks, research finds
