Reported by 1 source

The short version

  • Deactivated social media accounts reveal that Natalie Harp posted over one hundred fifty pro-Trump messages on January 6, 2021.
  • The posts included repeated assertions that the election was stolen and urged followers to never concede the results.
  • Intimate letters and family concerns have intensified questions regarding the nature of Harp’s relationship with the president.

Newly reported details regarding the social media activity of Natalie Harp, a senior aide in the Trump White House, indicate she actively promoted false claims about the 2020 election results on the day of the Capitol attack. According to reporting from CNN, a now-disabled account associated with Harp contained more than one hundred fifty posts on January 6, 2021. These messages repeatedly urged supporters to reject the election outcome and included slogans such as 'Fight for Trump' and declarations that Washington had become 'Trump Country.'

The volume and intensity of these posts suggest a deep commitment to the narrative that the election was fraudulent, a claim widely debunked by courts and election officials. Harp’s messages on that day mirrored the rhetoric used by President Donald Trump during his speech at the Ellipse, where he encouraged supporters to march to the Capitol. One post explicitly stated, 'We will never give up. We will never concede!' while another declared, 'Today we STOP THE STEAL!'

News Journal

This digital footprint extends beyond the single day of the insurrection. In the weeks preceding January 6, Harp’s account featured posts anticipating the event and reinforcing the idea that truth was on the side of those challenging the election results. She wrote to her followers that 'January 6th is coming!!' and framed the upcoming date as a pivotal moment for exposing alleged fraud. Days after the initial election results were certified, she characterized Joe Biden’s victory as a coup.

The resurfacing of these posts coincides with broader media examination of Harp’s role within the administration. Currently serving as special assistant to the president and executive assistant to the president, Harp holds positions that carry an annual salary of $150,000. Inside the White House, she has acquired the informal title of 'human printer,' a reference to her function in providing the president with printed materials and information. Her proximity to Trump has been noted as unusually close for someone in her position.

Scrutiny of Harp’s influence has been fueled by personal documents released recently. The Daily Beast published two letters written by Harp to Trump in 2023, which contain highly affectionate language. In one letter, she referred to the president as her 'Guardian and Protector in this Life' and stated that he was 'all that matters to me.' Another passage expressed a desire to bring him joy and avoid discussions focused solely on work, suggesting a relationship that extends beyond professional duties.

Family members have also raised concerns about the dynamic. Harp’s estranged brother has described her relationship with the president as unhealthy. These personal accounts add a layer of complexity to the public perception of her role, contrasting the formal responsibilities of her job with the intense personal devotion evident in her private correspondence and social media history.

The timeline of Harp’s engagement with Trump’s political narrative appears to have begun years before she joined his staff. Her social media account, created in 2016, includes posts from 2019 where she compared Trump to a biblical figure. She recounted a personal story involving medical errors and cancer, claiming that Trump intervened to save her life while the political establishment ignored her plight. This narrative framed him as a 'Good Samaritan' who rescued her when others failed.

It remains unclear when or why Harp’s social media account was deactivated. The platform, now known as X, has not provided specific details regarding the suspension, and it is uncertain whether the action was taken by the user or enforced by the site administrators. As investigations into the events of January 6 continue, these digital records provide additional context for understanding how key figures in the administration contributed to the atmosphere surrounding the election dispute.

The revelation of these posts adds to the growing body of evidence regarding the internal dynamics of the Trump campaign and subsequent administration. While Harp’s official duties involve administrative support, her public advocacy for election fraud claims during a critical period raises questions about the boundaries between personal loyalty and professional conduct in high-level government roles.

Political observers note that the intensity of Harp’s devotion is unusual even within the context of Trump’s inner circle. Senator Jon Ossoff recently commented on the situation, suggesting that Trump places significant value on Harp’s companionship. As the administration continues to operate under public scrutiny, the intersection of personal relationships and official responsibilities remains a focal point for journalists and analysts alike.

Sources behind this briefing

Go to the original reporting