The short version
- The independent news site Tapajós de Fato has suspended election reporting to protect its journalists from physical violence and intimidation.
- Co-founder Marcos Wesley Pedroso described a pattern of attacks including vehicle damage, surveillance, and death threats linked to environmental coverage.
- Press freedom organizations warn that such self-censorship undermines democratic accountability and reflects a broader surge in digital harassment against media workers.
An independent journalism platform based in the Brazilian Amazon has announced it will not cover the upcoming national elections, citing severe threats to the physical safety of its staff and their families. Tapajós de Fato, which focuses on environmental issues and Indigenous rights in Pará state, made the decision after a series of escalating incidents that co-founder Marcos Wesley Pedroso described as part of a coordinated campaign to silence their reporting. The outlet will remain operational and continue its coverage of ecological concerns, but it has explicitly withdrawn from electoral journalism for this cycle.
The rationale behind this withdrawal stems from a history of targeted aggression. Four years ago, during the previous presidential election, reporters found the tires of their work vehicle slashed. Shortly thereafter, a severed cat’s head was discovered near their parking area alongside a note bearing Pedroso’s name and a warning that he would be next. These events were not isolated; last July, security footage captured cyclists circling Pedroso’s residence, filming his car before another vehicle crashed into it. Pedroso interpreted this as an attempt to lure him outside for an ambush.
While law enforcement has not identified the perpetrators or confirmed a direct link between these incidents, Pedroso views them as interconnected responses to the site’s investigations into land disputes, pesticide contamination, and violations of Indigenous rights. The decision to step back from election coverage was made with the understanding that continuing would place the team at unacceptable risk. Pedroso stated that the fear of dying and endangering their families left no viable alternative, despite the professional duty to inform the public.
This self-imposed censorship raises alarms among press freedom advocates in Brazil. Letícia Kleim, legal coordinator for the Brazilian Association of Investigative Journalism, characterized the situation as a stark example of how attacks on journalists during electoral periods can effectively silence critical voices. She noted that silencing the messenger deprives communities and democracy at large of valuable information from within the region. The association is part of a coalition that has documented a sharp rise in online hostility toward media professionals.
Data collected between late August and mid-September revealed approximately 4,400 online attacks against journalists and media outlets on platforms such as X and Instagram. This figure represents a 67 percent increase compared to the two preceding weeks. Although it is too early to determine if total attack numbers will surpass those of the 2022 election, the current climate remains highly hostile. The previous election cycle was marked by intense rhetoric from then-President Jair Bolsonaro, who frequently attacked the press and made threatening remarks toward reporters.
Bolsonaro is currently under house arrest serving a sentence for attempting a coup after his defeat in 2022, which bars him from running again. However, political tensions remain high as his son, Senator Flávio Bolsonaro, trails closely behind incumbent President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in recent polls. Pedroso expressed significant concern about the possibility of Flávio Bolsonaro’s election, noting that reporting dangers were even more acute four years ago due to policies that fueled deforestation and criminal activity in Indigenous territories.
The broader context of violence against journalists in the Amazon is grim. In 2022, British journalist Dom Phillips and Brazilian Indigenous expert Bruno Pereira were ambushed and killed by men linked to a transnational criminal network exploiting an Indigenous territory. The NGO Comitê Chico Mendes issued a statement condemning the threats against Tapajós de Fato, arguing that normalizing an environment where fear dictates reporting boundaries is unacceptable. They emphasized that the Amazon cannot be a place where intimidation determines what stories are told.
Tapajós de Fato decided to publicize these threats after years of reporting them to authorities without seeing any investigative results. Pedroso acknowledged the humility and responsibility required in making such a difficult choice, recognizing the role the outlet plays in educating local communities. He conceded that while the decision protects the staff, it ultimately harms the people who rely on their information, leaving a void in democratic oversight during a critical political moment.
As Brazil approaches the first round of voting on October 4, the withdrawal of Tapajós de Fato serves as a cautionary tale about the fragility of press freedom. The incident underscores how physical violence and digital harassment can converge to force media outlets into self-censorship. Without effective protection for journalists, the quality of information available to voters in vulnerable regions like the Amazon may continue to deteriorate, weakening the democratic process.
The situation highlights a persistent challenge in Brazil: ensuring that journalists can operate safely while holding power to account. The lack of police action in previous cases has emboldened aggressors and eroded trust in institutional protection. As the election campaign intensifies, other media organizations may face similar pressures, raising questions about the long-term viability of independent journalism in areas where environmental and political interests intersect with criminal activity.
Sources behind this briefing
Go to the original reporting
- The Guardian US↗‘We’re afraid of dying’: Brazilian news site will not cover upcoming elections after threats
